|
Which to Follow,
the Word or the Church?
Jon
Burnett
The most fundamental disagreement between Catholics and
Christians is on the matter of authority. Throughout the
history of the Catholic Church, most Catholics view the
authority of the church as superior to that of the written
word. Their argument usually sounds something like this:
But, in order that…no gross illusion or general
misrepresentation may occur [in the revelation of Scripture]…the
Divine Spirit…becomes…a peculiarly Christian tact…which…leads
also into all truth. By a confiding attachment to the
perpetuated apostleship [and] by education in the Church…a deep
interior sense is formed that alone is fitted for the perception
and acceptance of the written word, because it entirely
coincides with the sense in which the Sacred Scriptures
themselves were composed. (Mohler via Peter C. Hodgson and
Robert H. King, Readings in Christian Theology
[Minneapolis, Minnesota: Augsburg Fortress Press, 1985], p. 38)
In
other words, the Catholic Church with its illuminated clergy is
the only one equipped to know and accept the written word of
God. No one else has the ability or authority to decide what is
Scriptural and what is not. A number of points are needed here
to refute these preposterous claims.
-
The Scriptures were provided to prevent error in the church,
not the other way around.
Heresy was a very real problem in the church of the New
Testament. False teachers ran rampant throughout early
congregations and even secured a strong enough influence in
some that they were able to drive out those who disagreed
with their divisive doctrines (cf. Galatians 1:6-10; 3 John
1:9-10). It was to remedy this situation that the written
word was introduced in the first place.
And he gave some to be apostles; and some, prophets; and some,
evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; for the perfecting
of the saints, unto the work of ministering, unto the building
up of the body of Christ:
till we all attain unto the unity of the faith, and of the
knowledge of the Son of God...that we may be no longer children,
tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine,
by the sleight of men, in craftiness, after the wiles of error; but
speaking truth in love, we may grow up in all things into him,
who is the head, even Christ. (Ephesians 4:11-15, emphasis
added)
-
The Scriptures contain the full written revelation of God to
man.
The word of God is in no need of being supplemented. “I
testify unto every man that heareth the words of the
prophecy of this book, if any man shall add unto them, God
shall add unto him the plagues which are written in this
book” (Revelation 22:18). Through God's word we are
"furnished completely unto every good work" (2 Timothy
3:16-17) and have been granted "all things that pertain unto
life and godliness" (2 Peter 1:3) since such was written
"that ye may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of
God; and that believing ye may have life in his name" (John
20:31). If the word prepares us completely to serve, live
and be saved, what more can the church have to offer that to
simply teach what has already been revealed?
-
The Spirit's revelatory role ceased with the completion of
the New Testament.
Though often disputed among Christians today, the role of
the Holy Spirit in the process of revelation was in fact a
limited one.
And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another
Comforter, that he may be with you for ever, even the Spirit of
truth...he
shall teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all
that I said unto you.
(John 14:16-17, 26, emphasis added).
Accompanying this revelation were spiritual gifts (i.e. "signs")
carried out in order to confirm the word as it was preached
(Mark 16:20). All of these roles, however, would cease with the
completion of the New Testament.
Love never faileth: but whether there be
prophecies,
they
shall be done away;
whether there be
tongues,
they
shall cease;
whether there be
knowledge,
it
shall be done away.
For we know in part, and we prophesy in part; but when that
which is perfect [i.e. complete in knowledge, prophecy and oral
revelation] is come, that which is in part shall be done away.
(1 Corinthians 13:8-10, emphasis added)
This completion was achieved by the close of the first century
(Jude 3).
-
The apostleship of the church is not perpetual.
Though almost universally claimed by Catholics throughout
history, the New Testament gives no indication to the
contrary. This is simply a matter of purpose and
qualifications. As addressed above the purpose
of the spiritually gifted (including the apostles) was to
reveal and confirm the written word. Once this was
accomplished, such offices ended. Secondly, should these
responsibilities have been required in perpetuity the
qualifications for such an office would be somewhat
different than those revealed in the New Testament.
Of
the men therefore that have companied with us all the time that
the Lord Jesus went in and went out among us [i.e. the first
century disciples], beginning from the baptism of John, unto the
day that he was received up from us, of these must one become a
witness with us of his resurrection [i.e. an apostle]. (Acts
1:16-22)
It
is an impossibility to claim that any man possesses these
qualifications today.
-
Public teaching does not remove the primacy of private study.
The example of the Bereans more than adequately illustrates
this point. "Now these were more noble than those in
Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all
readiness of the mind, examining the Scriptures daily,
whether these things were so" (Acts 17:11).
The word of God is constantly under assault from those outside
of the body of Christ. As important as our defense in this
direction is, though, we often practice the very thing we preach
against. How often do we listen to the preacher’s stories more
than the word itself (1 Corinthians 2:1-5)? How often do the
opinions of other leaders (elders, deacons, teachers, song
leaders and perhaps even denominationalists) matter more to us
than the simplicity of the gospel of Christ (1 Corinthians
14:37)?
Brethren, this ought not to be the case. No Christian, nor the
church at large, has any authority outside of that expressed in
word of God (Colossians 3:16-17). To do so is much more than
merely “being liberal” or “changing the way we do things,” it is
divisive (Romans 16:17), destructive (2 John 1:9) and demonic
(James 3:13-16). May we remember Paul’s warning to the church
at Corinth, “Therefore let him who
thinks he stands take heed lest he fall” (1 Corinthians 10:12,
NKJV). |